What is the test for material contribution to the risk of injury?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Martin v. Capital Health Authority, 2007 ABQB 260 (CanLII):

I do not propose to dwell on some of the other arguments counsel have developed, including alternative causation tests. Since Hanke v. Resurfice, (supra), in my view it is not necessary for me to review material contribution tests or arguments addressed about increase in risk. In this "but for" situation those considerations need not be addressed.

Other Questions


What is the relevant and material material material record in the context of a claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a plaintiff in a personal injury case who pleads a certain amount in damages and then amend that prayer as and when the extent of the injuries is learned? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the definition of a personal injury policy in the context of personal injury claims? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a constructive trust remedy be used in circumstances where the spouse has contributed not to the acquisition but has contributed to the preservation, maintenance or improvement of the property? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the provision of two medical reports in a personal injury action materially advance the action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant contributed to a plaintiff’s injuries? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the material contribution test been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff resort to resort to the less stringent material contribution test? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for any injuries caused or contributed to by their negligence? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a defendant be held liable for any injuries caused or contributed to by his or her negligence? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.