Is it misconduct to persuade a jury of a defendant's guilt by using deceptive or reprehensible methods?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Martinez, No. E047682 (Cal. App. 4/14/2010), No. E047682. (Cal. App. 2010):
Although defendant properly points out that it is misconduct to use deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury of the defendant's guilt (People v. Cash (2002) 28 Cal.4th 703, 733), or to express personal belief in the defendant's guilt on the basis of evidence not before the jury (People v. Hall (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 813, 817-818).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to commit misconduct committed misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a finding of misconduct against a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict a defendant? (California, United States of America)
Is it a prosecutorial misconduct for a prosecutor to use misleading, deceptive, reprehensible or reprehensible methods to persuade either the court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for misconduct when a prosecutor uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict a defendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict a defendant committed misconduct? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct for using deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict a defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for misconduct in a federal civil case when the jury finds that a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict him of misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict a defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for misconduct in criminal law when a prosecutor uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict him? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury commit misconduct? (California, United States of America)
