Is it harmless error to exclude evidence in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rosales, B257795 (Cal. App. 2015):
Rosales contends we must base our harmless error analysis on the federal standard articulated in Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, because his constitutional rights were violated. Given the facts stated above, it was harmless error to exclude the evidence even under the higher Chapman standard.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defence counsel sought to exclude the evidence of a witness in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether excluded evidence in a civil case is harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to admit or exclude evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
What is the test to exclude evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
