Is it error for a prosecutor to suggest that a reasonable account of the evidence satisfies the prosecutor's burden of proof?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Centeno, 180 Cal.Rptr.3d 649, 338 P.3d 938, 60 Cal.4th 659 (Cal. 2014):

Conversely, it is error for the prosecutor to suggest that a reasonable account of the evidence satisfies the prosecutor's burden of proof. In State v. Sappington (2007) 285 Kan. 176, 169 P.3d 1107, the prosecutor told

[60 Cal.4th 673]

Other Questions


Is it error for a prosecutor to suggest that a reasonable account of the evidence satisfies the prosecutor's burden of proof? (California, United States of America)
Is it error for a prosecutor to suggest that a reasonable interpretation of the evidence satisfies the prosecutor's burden of proof? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's assertion in closing argument that the defense had an obligation to present evidence sufficient to satisfy the prosecution's burden of proof valid? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a prosecutor to suggest that a defendant has a duty or burden to produce evidence to prove their innocence? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor comment on a defendant's failure to present evidence, thereby shifting the burden of proof to the defense? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comment on the lack of evidence showing bias and misconduct shift the burden of proof? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of proof for a prosecutor to argue that a reasonable doubt standard is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor manipulates the array of evidence before the grand jury, does the prosecutor have a duty to inform the jury of exculpatory evidence of which he or she is aware of? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor in a civil case argue to a jury that it can find a defendant guilty based on a reasonable account of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.