Is it easier or less expensive for a party seeking disclosure to have the full grand jury transcript at its disposal?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764 (2nd Cir. 1980):
5 We note that no compelling necessity for disclosure is shown where it is merely easier or less expensive for the party seeking disclosure to have the full grand jury transcript at its disposal. See United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., supra, 356 U.S. at 683, 78 S.Ct. at 986.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a party seeking non-disclosure or a protective order required to show good cause? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a party have jurisdiction to bring a supplemental pleading that alleges that a party was involved in a dispute with the other party before the date of filing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant seek suppression of evidence obtained by the police from a third party in violation of the third party's rights? ("New York", United States of America)
Is an agreement in writing that is signed by one party alone and delivered to and accepted by the other party binding upon both parties? (federal, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to rule that a party can seek damages from a third party for failing to pay a down payment of 10% on a mortgage? ("New York", United States of America)
Is there any case law in which the court has found that if a party is not moving, can the nonmoving party continue to sue the moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of a party seeking a stay pending appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a party who is not a party to a contract have standing to bring a tort claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does past exposure to illegal conduct mean a party must continue to seek injunctive relief? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a distribution of powers case, does the balancing of conflicting values between a party and party need to be reconciled? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
