Is it a crime for a male to be held responsible for the risk of pregnancy under section 261.5 of the Mississippi Code of Criminal Procedure?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Michael M. v. Superior Court, 159 Cal.Rptr. 340, 25 Cal.3d 608, 601 P.2d 572 (Cal. 1979):

Even if section 261.5 were actually intended to prevent pregnancy, its classification scheme nevertheless remains constitutionally deficient. The conduct that creates the risk of pregnancy is an act of sexual intercourse in which Both the male and the female participate. The act may have been solicited by the male, by the female, or simultaneously by both, and by definition it was wholly consensual. Thus when both parties participate in the decision to engage in the sexual act, each must be presumed equally responsible if pregnancy results. 4 Yet the statute, if it seeks to reduce pregnancy among unwed teenage girls, does so by punishing only the male for his part in this joint conduct. Although it is true that biologically only females can become pregnant, no compelling justification has been offered for holding the male but not the female criminally responsible for the same act. The statute is therefore impermissibly underinclusive. (See, e. g., Tatro v. State (Miss.1979) 372 So.2d 283 (statute making it a felony for a male but not a female to

Page 349

Other Questions


Does Section 26 exempt a person from criminal liability under section 26 of the California Criminal Code from a general intent crime if they committed the crime while unconscious? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Criminal Procedure, section 654 of the Criminal Code, allow a defendant to be punished for more than one act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code allow the penalty phase jury to consider the "circumstances" of the crime within the meaning of section 190 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.