The following excerpt is from Urbanec v. Lewis, 902 F.2d 42 (9th Cir. 1989):
2 In 1975, intoxication was not available as a mitigating factor to the death penalty, although Arizona courts have since construed the statute to include it. See State v. Jordan, 614 P.2d 825, 832 n. 5 (1980).
3 Intoxication was also a defense to the specific intent required for theft. See State v. Bridges, 12 Ariz.App. 153, 468 P.2d 604, 611 (1970). Strong circumstantial evidence could defeat the defense. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.