Is heat of passion provocation sufficient evidence to require the court to instruct on heat-of-passion provocation?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Kim, B251842 (Cal. App. 2015):

While the testimony of a single witness, such as the defendant, can constitute substantial evidence requiring the court to instruct on heat of passion provocation (People v. Lewis (2001) 25 Cal.4th 610, 646) as we concluded in the prior appeal, determining the weight and credibility of the witness is a task solely for the jury. (People v. Breverman, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 162.)

We affirm the judgment.

Other Questions


When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court consider the sufficiency of evidence in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to prevent or dissuade a victim or witness from reporting a crime? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court consider whether there is sufficient evidence to support a motion to dismiss an application for relief from the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a failure by a court to instruct on the meaning of provocation and heat of passion? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.