Is evidence of bad acts or uncharged crimes or bad acts inadmissible in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Stark, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 207, 13 Cal.App.4th 1357 (Cal. App. 1992):

[23 Cal.App.4th 1077] Evidence of a defendant's prior bad acts or uncharged crimes is inadmissible to show he had the criminal propensity to commit the crime charged. (Evid.Code, 1101, subd. (a); People v. Scott (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 550, 552-556, 239 Cal.Rptr. 588.) However, Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b) permits admission of prior "bad acts" if relevant to resolving an issue in the case or to prove some fact such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake.

Other Questions


What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of an uncharged crime admissible in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is accused of a sexual offence in a criminal action in which he is also accused of another sexual offence, is evidence of his disposition to commit such crimes considered to be inadmissible under California Evidence Code section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Is there a consequence that if a gang member is convicted of a criminal offence by virtue of his or her actions, such that the crime proceeds to a criminal enterprise and the criminal damage caused by the crime? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the evidence of uncharged crimes against a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of other crimes or bad acts generally inadmissible when offered to show a defendant had a criminal disposition or propensity to commit the crime charged? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence of uncharged crimes and acts of misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence in a criminal case where an expert testified that there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.