Is evidence more prejudicial than probative under a deferential abuse of discretion standard?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Deville, E057286 (Cal. App. 2013):

We review the trial court's evidentiary rulings, including whether evidence is more prejudicial than probative, under the deferential abuse of discretion standard. (People v. Rodrigues (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1060, 1124-1125.)

Other Questions


What is the standard of substantial evidence in the context of abuse of the abuse standard? (California, United States of America)
Is exclusion of evidence as more prejudicial than probative an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for granting probation under the deferential abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
When will a court not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in determining whether a judge abused discretion in finding that a plaintiff's photographs were prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of the abuse standard for exclusion of evidence under section 1154 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence over relevance and undue prejudice under the deferential abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.