The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Elliott, 94 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 1996):
1 Elliott also argues that he was entitled to present his entrapment-by-estoppel defense under the "silver platter" doctrine which prohibits federal authorities from using evidence seized unconstitutionally by local authorities. See Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 233 (1960). But his reliance on the "silver platter" doctrine is misplaced. The doctrine requires a district court to exclude evidence obtained unconstitutionally, not to admit otherwise inadmissible evidence of entrapment by estoppel.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.