Is Defendant's reliance on the law of the word "judicial review" relevant?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Walters, C075451 (Cal. App. 2015):
3. Defendant's reliance on People v. Atkins (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 536 is inapposite as review was granted in that case after briefing was concluded. (See People v. Atkins, supra, (review granted Nov. 12, 2014, S221786).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's reliance upon prior criminal records relevant to his identity as a member of a criminal gang relevant? (California, United States of America)
Is a judicial review of a decision of the State Bar recommending disbarment or suspension from practice an analogy between criminal proceedings and the resolution of reasonable doubts in the course of judicial review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether or not to grant a motion for judicial review of a motion requiring a judicial review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of the meaning of the word 'judicial review'? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's technical knowledge relevant to an assessment of his knowing exercise of the right to defend himself? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of judicial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's history of violence relevant to the sentencing of a defendant in a capital sentencing trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of a defendant's in camera review of an in-camera review of a prosecutor's file regarding an informant's past experiences with dangerous drugs? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant denied equal protection because he has not received either intercase proportionality review or appropriate intracase review? (California, United States of America)
