Is appellant entitled to be represented by counsel at a hearing on a motion to reduce his criminal conviction to a lesser charge?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Bareilles, A138295 (Cal. App. 2015):

3. Appellant, an attorney, represented himself for the majority of the proceedings in this case. He was represented by counsel for a period of time in 2010, including at the April 2 hearing on appellant's motion to reduce his offense to a misdemeanor and the June 18 restitution hearing.

4. People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754, 758.

Other Questions


If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
Can a reduction of a criminal conviction to a criminal charge change the nature of the criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
When a convicted criminal has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under section 1170.18, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, can the conviction be reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a conviction under section 186.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant has been convicted of a charge of criminal activity committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Is a convicted drug dealer entitled to have his criminal conviction reduced to a simple possession charge under section 1170.18 of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to convict a defendant of a lesser charge before the charge requiring acquittal of the greater charge is considered? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a new criminal conviction for a charge of possession of a drug with intent to commit a criminal offence violate subdivision (e) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both counts of membership of a criminal street gang and a charge of criminal activity under section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.