Is alcoholism a recognized mental condition for purposes of rule 4.413(c)(2)?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Quach, C079955 (Cal. App. 2016):

First, even if, as defendant contends, alcoholism was a recognized mental condition for purposes of rule 4.413(c)(2), this would not have automatically qualified defendant for probation. Rule 4.413's provisions are " 'permissive, not mandatory,' " and the court " 'may but is not required to find the case unusual if the relevant criterion is met under each of the subdivisions.' " (People v. Stuart, supra, 156 Cal.App.4th at p. 178.)

Other Questions


Is evidence of mental disease, mental defect or mental disorder admissible in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that alcohol was not a factor in determining whether a defendant's mental state was impaired by alcohol? (California, United States of America)
Does a probation condition that imposes limitations on a person's constitutional rights need to be closely tailored to the purpose of the probation condition? (California, United States of America)
Does a no-alcohol condition need to be imposed on a defendant who has a history of alcohol abuse? (California, United States of America)
What is the purpose of a summary hearing in a motor vehicle accident case where a driver has been found to have been impaired by alcohol while driving under the influence of alcohol? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for imposing a no-alcohol condition on a defendant who has a history of alcohol abuse? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant seek to have the jury consider his mental disorders in combination with his intoxication when assessing his mental state at the time of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant call an expert to testify that he had a mental disorder or condition such as PTSD or dissociation? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that evidence of a defendant's previous violent crimes is not indicative of his character or mental condition render the evidence inadmissible? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.