California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Quach, C079955 (Cal. App. 2016):
First, even if, as defendant contends, alcoholism was a recognized mental condition for purposes of rule 4.413(c)(2), this would not have automatically qualified defendant for probation. Rule 4.413's provisions are " 'permissive, not mandatory,' " and the court " 'may but is not required to find the case unusual if the relevant criterion is met under each of the subdivisions.' " (People v. Stuart, supra, 156 Cal.App.4th at p. 178.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.