Is a trial court required to state its reasons for sentencing a defendant to a minimum sentence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Howard, B214985, No. YA071270 (Cal. App. 2010):

The trial court "shall state the reasons for its sentence choice on the record at the time of sentencing." ( 1170, subd. (c); People v. Sandoval, supra, 41 Cal.4th at pp. 846-847; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.420(e) ["The reasons for selecting one of the three authorized prison terms... must be stated orally on the record"].) However, the court is not required "to cite 'facts' that support its decision or to weigh aggravating and mitigating circumstances," nor must it provide a " 'concise statement of the ultimate facts

Page 6

that the court deemed to constitute circumstances in aggravation or mitigation.' [Citation.]" (People v. Sandoval, supra, at p. 847.)

Other Questions


Is a trial court's failure to provide a statement of reasons for sentencing a defendant to a sentence that would have changed the sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure by defendant's trial attorney to object at his sentencing hearing after the trial court indicated that it would impose upper term sentences on count one and the enhancement? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a sentencing court have to state the reasons for its sentence choice on the record at the time of sentencing? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that the trial court erred by failing to expressly state its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences? (California, United States of America)
What are the reasons for a sentencing court to sentence a defendant to two consecutive terms of consecutive sentences under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a reduced sentence from a sentencing court where the sentencing court was unaware of the scope of its discretionary powers? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who entered into a plea bargain in return for a less lenient sentence at the appellate court challenge the sentence imposed by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.