Is a tortfeasor jointly and severally liable for noneconomic damages in a motor vehicle accident?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Hughes v. Pham, E052469 (Cal. App. 2014):

Prior to the enactment of section 1431.2, tortfeasors were jointly and severally liable for both economic and noneconomic damages. In 1986, the electorate adopted Proposition 51, which altered the long-standing doctrine of joint and several liability. (Evangelatos v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1188, 1192-1193.) Section 1431.2, which was enacted pursuant to Proposition 51, provides, in pertinent part: "(a) In any action for personal injury, property damage, or wrongful death, based upon principles of comparative fault, the liability of each defendant for non-economic damages shall be several only and shall not be joint. Each defendant shall be liable only for the amount of non-economic damages allocated to that defendant in direct proportion to that defendant's percentage of fault, and a separate judgment shall be rendered against that defendant for that amount." ( 1431.2, subd. (a).) Because each defendant is now solely responsible for his or her share of the noneconomic damages, to allow an offset for the portion of a settlement which is designated for noneconomic damages would, in effect,

Page 20

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
What are damages for a plaintiff who suffered from severe brain damage as a result of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is liable for damages awarded in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for joint and several liability in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Is a public body liable for damages under section 815 of the Government Code for injuries sustained by a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.