California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rumbeck v. Premier Valley, Inc., C/w Case No. F072523, F072262 (Cal. App. 2017):
In support of his argument, Rumbeck cites the general rule that a single, indivisible offer made to more than one plaintiff is not considered valid under section 998 because it would require the plaintiff offerees to agree to a division of the settlement proceeds or to an allocation of those proceeds to the various causes of action in issue. (Meissner v. Paulson (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 785, 791 (Meissner) ["only an offer made to a single plaintiff, without need for allocation or acceptance by other plaintiffs, qualifies as a valid offer under section 998"].)
Page 20
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.