The following excerpt is from Hoffman v. Bosenko, No. 2:16-cv-0756 DB P (E.D. Cal. 2018):
"A 'pattern of similar constitutional violations by untrained employees is ordinarily necessary to demonstrate deliberate indifference for purposes of failure to train,' though there exists a 'narrow range of circumstances [in which] a pattern of similar violations might not be necessary to show deliberate indifference.'" Flores v. County of Los Angeles, 758 F.3d 1154, 1159 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011)). In this "narrow range of circumstances," a single incident may suffice to establish deliberate indifference where the violation of constitutional rights is a "highly predictable consequence" of a failure to train because that failure to train is "so patently obvious." Connick, 563 U.S. at 64. Further, the identified training deficiency must be casually connected to the ultimate injury. City of Canton, 489 U.S. at 391.
Page 7
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.