The following excerpt is from Munoz v. Smith, 20-16327 (9th Cir. 2021):
Similarly, in McNab v. Kok, 170 F.3d 1246 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we addressed Oregon's sex offender registration requirements. We concluded there that "because Oregon's sex offender registration requirements place no greater restraint on personal liberty than those of California and Washington, the Oregon law does not place [the petitioner] in custody within the meaning of section 2254(a)." Id. at 1247.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.