Is a sentence for possessing child pornography and producing child pornography for a commercial purpose stayed under section 654 of the Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Stringer, H045540 (Cal. App. 2020):

Defendant argues that punishment for counts 5 and 7 (possessing child pornography and producing child pornography for a commercial purpose, respectively) must be stayed under section 654 because they were part of the same, indivisible course of conduct as that supporting the human trafficking convictions (counts 1 and 2).1 He also argues that, even assuming counts 1 and 2 can be separated from counts 5 and 7, the punishment for count 5 must be stayed because the intent underlying it was indivisible from the intent underlying count 7. Although defendant did not raise a section 654 objection regarding counts 5 and 7 at sentencing, a sentence that violates section 654 is unauthorized and therefore reviewable in the first instance on appeal. (People v. Perez (1979) 23 Cal.3d 545, 549, fn. 3.)

Section 654, subdivision (a) provides: "An act or omission that is punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under the provision that provides for the longest potential term of imprisonment, but in no case shall the act or omission be punished under more than one provision." Section 654 applies "not only where there was but one act in the ordinary sense, but also where there was a course of conduct which violated more than one statute but nevertheless constituted an indivisible transaction." (People v. Perez, supra, 23 Cal.3d at p. 551.) Whether a course of conduct is indivisible depends on the intent and objective of the defendant. (Ibid.) Separate punishment is permissible if the defendant had "multiple or simultaneous objectives, independent of and not merely incidental to each other." (People v. Cleveland (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 263, 267 (Cleveland).) And even offenses that are aimed at a single intent or objective can be punished separately to the extent they are "temporally separated in such a way as to afford the defendant opportunity to reflect and to renew his or her intent before committing the next one, thereby aggravating the violation of public

Page 7

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Is a sentencing court acting in excess of its jurisdiction and imposes an unauthorized sentence when it erroneously stays or fails to stay execution of a sentence under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 669, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, section 669 of the Criminal Code apply to a life sentence for a convicted rapist who has been sentenced to life in prison without a chance of parole? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to issue an "unauthorized" sentence when it erroneously stays or fails to stay execution of a sentence under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a court's failure to stay execution of a sentence under section 654 of the Criminal Code for possession of burglary tools constitute forfeiture of the sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the one third-the-midterm rule of section 1170.1, subdivision (a) under section 654 of the California Criminal Code when applying to stay a sentence under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.