The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Lopez, 547 F.3d 397 (2nd Cir. 2008):
Lopez argues that the warrantless search of his bedroom without his consent was unreasonable under Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006). We disagree.
When considering a district court's ruling on a suppression motion, we review factual findings for clear error and legal determinations de novo. United States v. Rommy, 506 F.3d 108, 128 (2d Cir.2007).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.