Is a requested instruction in a personal injury trial "perspective" or "objectionative"?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Weeden v. Johnson, No. 2:13-cv-02667-JKS (E.D. Cal. 2014):

perspective."). Because the requested instruction "invite[d] the jury to draw inferences favorable to one of the parties from specified items of evidence, it is considered argumentative and therefore should not [have] be[en] given." People v. Earp, 978 P.2d 15, 54 (Cal. 1999) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Other Questions


What is the standard of damages for personal injury damages in personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the state's position on personal injury law in the context of personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a jury verdict in a personal injury case brought by a defendant who failed to raise his objections to the trial judge on the motion, can the appellant appeal to the Court of Appeal to review the motion by the same judge? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a party raises a contemporaneous objection to a jury instruction, does the court have to review the original instruction or grant a new trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for assessing personal injury fees in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How do you deal with a claim of personal injury in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a client who relies on his attorney for personal injury purposes have an obligation to timely filing in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the scheduling of a personal injury trial by a federal judge exceed its "great deal of latitude" in scheduling trials? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a person who has been found unfit to stand trial for murder by reason of reason is considered to be a "dangerous person" under s. 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Mental Health Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.