Is a recitation of only the appellant's evidence not the "demonstration" contemplated under the above rule?

"'A recitation of only [the appellant's] evidence is not the "demonstration" contemplated under the above rule. [Citation.] Accordingly, if, as [Kay] here contend[s], "some particular issue of fact is not sustained [he is] required to set forth in [his] brief all of the material evidence on the point and not merely [his] own evidence. Unless this is done the error is deemed to be waived."'" (People v. Dougherty, supra, 138 Cal.App.3d at p. 282; accord, Grassilli v. Barr, supra, 142 Cal.App.4th at p. 1279.)