Is a prosecutor improperly vouching for the strength of the evidence by describing a hypothetical crime in front of the jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lake, D074304 (Cal. App. 2020):

Defendant also contends that the prosecutor was improperly vouching for the strength of the evidence by her description of a hypothetical crime that occurred in front of the jury. " 'Impermissible "vouching" may occur where the prosecutor places the prestige of the government behind a witness through personal assurances of the witness's veracity or suggests that information not presented to the jury supports the witness's testimony.' " (People v. Williams (1997) 16 Cal.4th 153, 257.) The prosecutor's description of a hypothetical crime that occurred in the courtroom neither placed the

Page 23

Other Questions


When a prosecutor manipulates the array of evidence before the grand jury, does the prosecutor have a duty to inform the jury of exculpatory evidence of which he or she is aware of? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper vouching when a prosecutor's comments about the plea deals offered to witnesses before the jury are not disclosed to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor who described the defense case as "ludicrous," "contrived" and "bogus" in his arguments to the jury use improper or improper language? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor makes an argument that the prosecutor was aware of the facts to the jury in a death penalty case, is it improper or improper? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor said that appellant had failed to produce any evidence at trial, and the appellant failed to present any evidence to the jury, is that comment improper or harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim of prosecutorial misconduct when a prosecutor's comments to the jury before the jury in a criminal case are deemed improper or improper? (California, United States of America)
What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor improperly present improper evidence to a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a prosecutor's argument to a jury in a criminal case that the jury should consider mitigation in all mitigation evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.