Is a prosecution required to monitor every material witness in a criminal case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rangel, F071772 (Cal. App. 2018):
"The prosecution is not required 'to keep "periodic tabs" on every material witness in a criminal case . . . .' [Citation.] Also, the prosecution is not required, absent knowledge of a 'substantial risk that this important witness would flee,' to 'take adequate preventative measures' to stop the witness from disappearing. [Citation.]" (People v. Wilson (2005) 36 Cal.4th 309, 342.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a prosecutor required to monitor every material witness in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor required to monitor every material witness in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is the prosecution required to accept a stipulation requiring the prosecution to present their case in a witness statement? (California, United States of America)
Does the prosecution have to keep "periodic tabs" on every material witness in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.1 of the California Criminal Code require the prosecution to disclose the names and addresses of witnesses it intends to call as witnesses at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Fifth Amendment of the Federal and California Constitution require a witness in a criminal case to be a witness against himself? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the prosecution of a witness in a criminal case involving compelled testimony differ from the prosecution related to matters about which he testified? (California, United States of America)
Does the prosecution need to notify the defense of a material witness prior to the conclusion of the preliminary hearing that the material witness will be deported? (California, United States of America)
Is the court abused its discretion in refusing to protect a witness in a sexual assault case from the possibility that the prosecution witnesses in the case colluded to corroborate their testimony? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a material witness was unavailable through a state action even though the material witness had been deported? (California, United States of America)
