California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Pinedo, 60 Cal.App.4th 1403, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 151 (Cal. App. 1998):
Appellant finally claims the probation officer lacked sufficient information to determine whether the attorney's fees were reasonable. The amount of fees due under a contingency fee agreement may be unreasonable in light of the work actually performed (see, e.g., People ex rel. Dept. of Transportation v. Yuki (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1754, 1769-1771, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 616), but appellant presented no evidence at the sentencing hearing to show the contingency fee was disproportionate in this case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.