Is a postjudgment order denying attorney fees and costs appealable?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Lakin v. Watkins Associated Industries, 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 109, 6 Cal.4th 644, 863 P.2d 179 (Cal. 1993):

4 Appealable postjudgment orders include both those granting affirmative relief and those denying it. (See Gilman v. Contra Costa County (1857) 8 Cal. 52, 57.) It is true that on occasion an order granting a particular motion may be appealable while an order denying the same motion may not be, or vice versa. For example, this court noted in Wood v. Peterson Farms Co. (1931) 214 Cal. 94, 98, 3 P.2d 922, that although an order denying relief from default in the preparation of a reporter's transcript was appealable because it had "the effect of precluding an appellant from presenting his case on appeal," an order granting relief from default would not be appealable, presumably because it was not a final determination of the rights of the parties and would be appealable as part of the later appellate proceedings. There is, however, no parallel distinction to be made between an order granting attorney fees and an order denying them. In either case the resulting determination is final; in neither case would the ruling become appealable as part of later proceedings.

5 We note in addition that in Fulton v. Fulton (1934) 220 Cal. 726, 729, 32 P.2d 634, this court described--although without analysis, and with no reference to any effect on, or relationship to, the judgment--a postjudgment order denying attorney fees and costs on appeal as an appealable order not subject to review on appeal from the judgment.

6 Given our holding that the order is appealable as an order made after a judgment, we need not consider the alternate ground suggested by the plaintiff: that the order is appealable as "an order which determines a matter collateral to the main action ... [as well as] severable from the general objective of the litigation and ... a decision thereon determines finally the rights of the parties in relation to the collateral matter, leaving no further judicial action to be taken in regard to that matter." ( Henneberque v. City of Culver City, supra, 172 Cal.App.3d 837, 841, 218 Cal.Rptr. 704.)

Other Questions


Can an order denying postjudgment motions for attorney fees and expenses incurred in enforcing a judgment and a renewed judgment be appealed? (California, United States of America)
Does Attorney General Jeff Sessions have to appeal from an order after judgment where he was ordered to pay attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
Is an order denying a postjudgment motion for attorney fees and expenses incurred in enforcing the judgment, appealable? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal on the appeal of a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Attorney General to produce a copy of the Plaintiff's file? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
If the parties have appealed against the Superior Court's order that the parties can continue to argue that the issues addressed by the orders are moot, can they appeal against the orders? (California, United States of America)
Does a notice of appeal from an unappealable order denying new trial have to be interpreted as an appeal from the underlying order? (California, United States of America)
Is a postjudgment order denying attorney fees separately appealable? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have to continue to hear an appeal from an appellant who, as a result of the July 19, 2016 order rendered this appeal moot? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.