Is a Port Agent a state officer for purposes of the CPRA?

In the appellate writ proceeding, we held that the Port Agent was a state officer for purposes of the CPRA. We noted, "it was the Port Agent ... who argued for immunity from suit based on his status as a government official when assigning or supervising pilots.... The doctrine of judicial estoppel, sometimes referred to as the doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions, "prevents a party from asserting a position in a legal proceeding that is contrary to a position previously taken in the same or some earlier proceeding." (Jackson v. County of Los Angeles (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 171, 181 [70 Cal.Rptr.2d 96] ) []... [] ... The Port Agent fails to explain why one

[242 Cal.App.4th 1051]