Is a police officer's exhortation to an accused to "tell the truth" sufficient to induce a subsequent confession?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Saplala, G044329 (Cal. App. 2012):

"The line to be drawn between permissible police conduct and conduct [inducing] an involuntary statement does not depend upon the bare language of inducement but rather upon the nature of the benefit to be derived by a defendant if he speaks the truth, as represented by the police. Thus, 'advice or exhortation by a police officer to an accused to "tell the truth" or that "it would be better to tell the truth" unaccompanied by either a threat or a promise, does not render a subsequent confession involuntary.'" (People v. Hill (1967) 66 Cal.2d 536, 549.) "When the benefit pointed out by the police to a suspect is merely that which flows naturally from a truthful and honest course of conduct, we can perceive nothing improper in such police activity. On the other hand, if in addition to the forgoing benefit, or in the place thereof, the defendant is given to understand that he might reasonably expect benefits in the nature of more lenient treatment at the hands of the police, prosecution or court in consideration of making a statement, even a truthful one, such motivation is deemed to render the statement involuntary and inadmissible. The offer or promise of such benefit need not be expressed, but may be implied from equivocal language not otherwise made clear." (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Is a police officer's exhortation to an accused to "tell the truth" sufficient to induce a subsequent confession? (California, United States of America)
Is a police officer's exhortation to "tell the truth" sufficient to induce a subsequent confession? (California, United States of America)
Is a police officer's exhortation to "tell the truth" sufficient to compel a suspect to give a subsequent confession? (California, United States of America)
Does a threat or exhortation by the police to "tell the truth" or that "it would be better" to be honest with the police compel a subsequent confession? (California, United States of America)
Does a police officer's exhortation to "tell the truth" render a subsequent confession involuntary? (California, United States of America)
Does a threat or exhortation by the police to "tell the truth" or that "it would be better" to be honest with the police compel a subsequent confession? (California, United States of America)
Is a simple directive to "testify" to an experienced police officer sufficient to impress the witness with the duty to tell the truth? (California, United States of America)
Is it reasonable to assume that a confession made by an accused as a result of improper police conduct is a subsequent confession? (California, United States of America)
Does a threat or exhortation by the police that it would be better for the accused to tell the truth be considered involuntary? (California, United States of America)
Is a promise made by a police officer or person in authority of leniency or advantage to the accused sufficient to invalidate the confession? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.