Is a plea of guilty sufficient to overturn a conviction of sexual assault?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Godfrey, 147 Cal.Rptr. 9, 81 Cal.App.3d 896 (Cal. App. 1978):

Neither is subdivision 6 of Penal Code section 1181 applicable upon a plea of guilty. That part of the statute provides that upon defendant's motion for new trial: " . . . if the evidence shows the defendant to be not guilty of the degree of the crime of which he was convicted, but guilty of a lesser degree thereof, or of a lesser crime included therein, the court may modify the verdict, finding or judgment accordingly without granting or ordering a new trial . . . ." This section presupposes the need to examine evidence upon which the defendant was convicted. The section can apply only to a conviction founded upon evidence presented and a decision by the trier of fact. It does not apply to a conviction by plea. Since a guilty plea admits all the elements of an offense charged (People v. Meals, 49 Cal.App.3d 702, 706, 122 Cal.Rptr. 585), the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be attacked or inquired into after a guilty plea.

Other Questions


What is the difference between a sexual assault conviction and a conviction for sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a conviction for sexual assault against a man who was found guilty of sexual assault by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the evidence was sufficient to overturn a sexual assault conviction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal overturn a conviction for sexual assault against a man who was found guilty by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
Is insufficient evidence sufficient to overturn a conviction for sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in a sexual assault case, what is the test for overturning the conviction? (California, United States of America)
In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, what is the test for a jury to convict a defendant of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
Is insufficient evidence sufficient to overturn a conviction for sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
When testifying in a sexual assault case, does the use of the word "sex" by the victims constitute sufficient evidence for the purposes of sexual arousal or sexual gratification? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court overturn a conviction of sexual assault against a man who was found guilty by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.