Is a plea agreement binding a judge to impose a sentence within the limits of a plea bargain?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Armendariz, 16 Cal.App.4th 906, 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 311 (Cal. App. 1993):

"While no bargain or agreement can divest the court of the sentencing discretion it inherently possesses [citation], a judge who has accepted a [16 Cal.App.4th 911] plea bargain is bound to impose a sentence within the limits of that bargain. [Citation.] 'A plea agreement is, in essence, a contract between the defendant and the prosecutor to which the court consents to be bound.' [Citations.] Should the court consider the plea bargain to be unacceptable, its remedy is to reject it, not to violate it, directly or indirectly. [Citation.] Once the court has accepted the terms of the negotiated plea, '[it] lacks jurisdiction to alter the terms of a plea bargain so that it becomes more favorable to a defendant unless, of course, the parties agree.' [Citation.]" (People v. Ames (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1214, 1217, 261 Cal.Rptr. 911.)

Other Questions


Can a sentencing judge who did not preside over the trial and has "minimal familiarity with the case" exercise his discretion in imposing harsher individual sentencing terms than the prior sentencing judge? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of a court in sentencing a defendant to a sentence that is within the legislatively determined limits of a criminal sentence? (California, United States of America)
When a judge's original sentencing has been struck down by the Court of Appeal, does the sentencing court have the power to impose any sentence permitted under the applicable statutes and rules on remand? (California, United States of America)
Can a sentence imposed by a judge other than the one who accepted a plea bargain stand? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reduction in a sentence when the sentencing judge was unaware it had a chance to reduce the sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal sentencing scheme that allows a federal judge to impose a sentence above the statutory maximum based on a fact other than a prior conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge who sentenced a defendant to a determinate and indeterminate sentence need to serve the determinate sentence equally? (California, United States of America)
Does a sentencing judge have to articulate a statement of reasons for imposing a consecutive sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the limitation on time limitations in a collective bargaining agreement? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal sentencing scheme that allows a federal judge to impose a maximum sentence based on a fact other than a prior conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.