Is a plaintiff's claim that respondent was required to give him a written warning upon his discharge from employment valid?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Glover v. City of Santa Barbara, 2d Civil No. B257114 (Cal. App. 2015):
Appellant has forfeited his claim that respondent was required to give such a warning upon his discharge from employment. The claim is not supported by meaningful legal analysis and citations to pertinent authority. " 'A judgment or order of the lower court is presumed correct. All intendments and presumptions are indulged to support it on matters as to which the record is silent, and error must be affirmatively shown.' " (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) "To demonstrate error, appellant must present meaningful legal analysis supported by citations to authority . . . ." (In re S.C. (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 396, 408.)
Page 8
The judgment is affirmed. Respondent shall recover its costs on appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
