The following excerpt is from Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 904 F.Supp.2d 1009 (E.D. Cal. 2012):
Finally, to the extent that plaintiff is attempting to allege a theory of alternative liability as first articulated in Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80, 8286, 199 P.2d 1 (1948), that theory is inapplicable because
[904 F.Supp.2d 1033]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.