The following excerpt is from Fairly v. United States, CASE NO. 1:95-cr-05193-LJO (E.D. Cal. 2012):
"A motion under 2255 is generally the exclusive remedy for a federal prisoner who seeks to challenge the legality of confinement." Muth v. Fondren, 676 F.3d 815, 818 (9th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Washington, 653 F.3d 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 2255(h)). "Because of the difficulty of meeting this standard, petitioners often attempt to characterize their motions in a way that
Page 5
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.