Is a malicious prosecution suit subject to the anti-SLAPP statute?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Kleveland v. Siegel & Wolensky, LLP, 155 Cal.Rptr.3d 599, 215 Cal.App.4th 534 (Cal. App. 2013):

A malicious prosecution suit is subject to the anti-SLAPP statute. ( Daniels v. Robbins (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 204, 215, 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 683.)

[215 Cal.App.4th 549]

Other Questions


Does the limitation period for malicious prosecution apply to malicious prosecution? (California, United States of America)
Can a malicious prosecution plaintiff obtain a preliminary injunction against the malicious prosecution defendants? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations for a malicious prosecution action against an attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney be held liable for malicious prosecution for continuing to prosecute a lawsuit discovered to lack probable cause? (California, United States of America)
Is Proposition 8 a single subject subject to the single subject rule? (California, United States of America)
Can a party avoid liability for malicious prosecution claim if they relied on the advice of counsel in prosecuting the action? (California, United States of America)
Is a malicious prosecution motion subject to an anti-SLAPP motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations for a malicious prosecution action against an attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does a statute on a particular subject omits a particular provision in another statute concerning a related matter? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.