Is a liability insurer permitted to assume and conduct a defense of an action brought against the insured on the basis of forfeiture or noncoverage?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Dollinger Deanza Assocs. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., H035576 (Cal. App. 2011):

However, only liability insurers are subject to an exception. " 'The general rule supported by the great weight of authority is that if a liability insurer, with knowledge of a ground of forfeiture or noncoverage under the policy, assumes and conducts the defense of an action brought against the insured, without disclaiming liability and giving notice of its reservation of rights, it is thereafter precluded in an action upon the policy from setting up such ground of forfeiture or noncoverage. In other words, the insurer's unconditional defense of an action brought against the insured constitutes a waiver of the terms of the policy and an estoppel of the insured to assert such grounds.' [Citation.]" (Miller v. Elite Ins. Co. (1980) 100 Cal.App.3d 739, 755.)

Other Questions


Is a liability insurer permitted to assume and conduct the defense of an action brought against the insured? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Is an insurer's unconditional defense of an action brought against its insured a waiver of the terms of the policy and estoppel of the insurer to assert such grounds? (California, United States of America)
Does an insurer have a right to control defense and settlement of the third party action against its insured? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under Insurance Code section 790.03 against an insurer for breach of the Insurance Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test of good faith and fair-dealing in the context of an insurance policy where the insurer is required to hire an attorney to defend the insured against the insured? (California, United States of America)
In a civil action brought by the Attorney General for the purposes of forfeiture, what is the test for forfeiture? (California, United States of America)
In a civil action brought by the Attorney General for the purposes of forfeiture, what is the test for forfeiture? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
When will an insurance policy require an insurer to assume liability for someone who is injured before the policy expires? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.