Is a jury's failure to give unanimity instruction in a sexual assault case harmless?

Here, defendant's primary defense to counts 3 and 4 was he lacked the requisite sexual intent, which the jury clearly rejected, as was its right as trier of fact.⁶ (See People v. Wolfe (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 177, 188 [noting failure to give unanimity instruction was harmless where jury rejected the defendant's single defense to all instances of firearm possession].) The failure to give a unanimity instruction in the instant case was therefore harmless.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.