Is a jury allowed to consider the testimony of an informer in a murder trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Garceau, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 664, 6 Cal.4th 140, 862 P.2d 664 (Cal. 1993):

Defendant contends the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury pursuant to special instruction A, which would have cautioned the jury to examine with greater care the testimony of an informer. 20 This instruction was patterned upon the federal rule that requires the giving of a cautionary instruction regarding the testimony of an informant when that testimony furnishes the only strong evidence of guilt. (United States v. Patterson (9th Cir.1981) 648 F.2d 625, 630-631.) Defendant contends the giving of this [6 Cal.4th 191] instruction was required because the prosecution's case relied upon the testimony of five witnesses who stated that defendant had confessed to the murders.

Other Questions


Does a jury have to consider felony murder or premeditated murder before it considers the lesser included offense of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible testimony at a civil trial of a witness giving evidence in a testimony that was not in the context of the trial? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on first degree murder because the information alleged only that the murder of Agent Cross was committed with malice aforethought? (California, United States of America)
When will a jury consider the credibility of a defendant's extrajudicial statements against trial testimony and the physical evidence and testimony of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury at a murder trial consider whether to reduce the severity of the aider and abettor's sentence to a lesser degree of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.