Is a judgment for the full amount of a loan that was fraudulently induced consistent with the other two causes of action consistent?

[266 Cal.App.2d 589] In Bohn v. Watson, supra, 130 Cal.App.2d 24, 278 P.2d 454, where two causes of action were held to be consistent, judgment for the full amount of a fraudulently induced loan was rendered on one cause of action based on fraud, and for the amount of the note and attorney's fees on a second cause of action on the note; ⁵ the judgment on one of the two causes of action was said to be 'concurrent' with the judgment on the other cause of action 'to the extent thereof.'