Is a flight instruction a cautionary one that benefits the defense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Chacon, F069786 (Cal. App. 2016):

The flight instruction is a cautionary one that benefits the defense " 'by "admonishing the jury to circumspection regarding evidence that might otherwise be considered decisively inculpatory." [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Leon, supra, 61

Page 55

Other Questions


Is a flight instruction a cautionary one that benefits the defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for instructing a jury with the flight instruction where there is evidence of a defendant's flight? (California, United States of America)
Does the instruction that the jury was to follow the instructions if an attorney's comments appeared to be in conflict with the instructions apply? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal or state law error for failing to instruct on a requested affirmative defense instruction supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to propose any modification to a flight instruction forfeits a claim of instructional error? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Does a court need to give Sua sponte a cautionary instruction that testimony pertaining to the flight be viewed with caution? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel request further instructions to instruct the jury that the absence of mitigation is not an aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.