Is a finding of fact by a federal district court reviewable de novo?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Leslie Salt Co. v. U.S., 896 F.2d 354 (9th Cir. 1990):
The district court's findings of fact are subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review. Issues of law, as well as mixed questions of fact and law that involve consideration of legal concepts rather than essentially factual inquiries, are reviewable de novo. United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200-02 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824, 105 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for certifying a motion by a federal district court to overturn a finding that the district court acted in the wrong way for the wrong reason? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court overturn a federal district court's finding that appellant waived his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a district court's confirmation of an arbitral award, does the court need to review a finding of fact for "clear error"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a finding of juror impartiality by a district court, what is the deference due to the district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
