Is a federal district court's decision not to admit evidence of other bad acts reviewed for abuse of discretion?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Bobbitt, 985 F.2d 574 (9th Cir. 1993):
"The district court's decision to admit evidence of other bad acts is reviewed for abuse of discretion." United States v. Ayers, 924 F.2d 1468, 1472 (9th Cir.1991).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a federal district court's decision to admit statements over hearsay objections reviewed for abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a review of a federal court's decision not to admit evidence of abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a district court's decision not to admit evidence within the scope of the Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal court's decision not to admit evidence of other bad acts reviewed for an abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a clear abuse of discretion in a federal district court's decision to admit evidence about the ATF investigations and the two grand jury proceedings? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's decision to exclude hearsay evidence reviewed for abuse of abuse of power? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion when a federal district court allows evidence to be admitted over a hearsay objection? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a sentence from a federal district court under a "deferential abuse of discretion" standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal court's decision not to admit evidence reviewed for abuse of power? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a trial court has admitted evidence pursuant to Rule 404(b) after performing a balancing analysis, can the decision be reviewed for abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
