Is a failure to instruct on accomplice testimony harmless?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Penunuri, 233 Cal.Rptr.3d 324, 418 P.3d 263, 5 Cal.5th 126 (Cal. 2018):

People v. Whisenhunt (2008) 44 Cal.4th 174, 215, 79 Cal.Rptr.3d 125, 186 P.3d 496 [failure to instruct on accomplice testimony is harmless where there is sufficient corroborating evidence in the record].)

Other Questions


Is a failure to give an accomplice instruction under section 1111 harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's failure to instruct on corroboration of witness testimony harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to instruct on accomplice liability under section 1111 harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to instruct on the law of accomplices harmless? (California, United States of America)
How have instructions been interpreted in a sexual assault case where a jury was instructed to give considerable weight to the testimony of an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
When an accomplice is called as a witness by the prosecution, is the jury required to distrust the testimony of their accomplice's testimony? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on accomplice liability harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on accomplice liability harmless? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of the Court's failure to instruct on an instructing on a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt finding? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to instruct on the elements of a second degree murder constitute a "failure to amplify or clarify the correct instruction"? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.