Is a failure to give a nonstatutory manslaughter instruction prejudicial per se?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Avalos, 159 Cal.Rptr. 736, 98 Cal.App.3d 701 (Cal. App. 1979):

Appellant then cites People v. Griffin (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 864, 96 Cal.Rptr. 218, for the proposition that failure to give a nonstatutory manslaughter instruction, Sua sponte, is prejudicial per se where the defense of diminished capacity is properly before the court and the court has been alerted to it by the evidence presented. That proposition is true where the case is tried on some theory of murder other than felony murder. In Griffin, careful reading of the opinion itself 5 shows the case [98 Cal.App.3d 719] was tried on murder grounds in addition to felony murder. (Id., at pp. 868, fn. 1, 870, 96 Cal.Rptr. 218.)

Other Questions


Is a jury's failure to instruct on a manslaughter instruction prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on an instruction on attempted voluntary manslaughter prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to instruct on the elements of a second degree murder constitute a "failure to amplify or clarify the correct instruction"? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to give diminished capacity-involuntary manslaughter instruction in a second degree murder case constitute a prejudicial error? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's failure to instruct a defendant in an involuntary manslaughter case prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does the failure of evidence and instruction regarding count 4 constitute prejudicial instructional errors? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct a jury fully on the relationship between diminished capacity and involuntary manslaughter prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's failure to instruct the jury that a killing in the heat of passion lacks malice and is at most voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
If a jury is instructed to convict a defendant of robbery based solely on the taking of items from the victim's person, is this instructional error inconsequential or prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.