Is a district court finding that the banding rule has an impact on a person's health sufficient to be considered adequate?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Clady v. Los Angeles County, 770 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1985):
District court findings are adequate if they are sufficiently comprehensive to provide a basis of decision and are supported by the record. See Irish v. United States, 225 F.2d 3, 8 (9th Cir.1955). Here, appellants failed to present evidence on the impact of the banding rule alone.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a final judgment from one district court is registered with another district court pursuant to Section 1963, is it treated like a judgment from the other district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal district court find that the Commission of Justice failed to adequately consider the specific aggravating circumstances of a claim brought by a plaintiff against the Commission for Civil Rights violations? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a court finds that a sanction imposed by a district court was an abuse of power, does the court have any authority to determine whether the sanction was abused or abused? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a finding of juror impartiality by a district court, what is the deference due to the district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for certifying a motion by a federal district court to overturn a finding that the district court acted in the wrong way for the wrong reason? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a person who has been found unfit to stand trial for murder by reason of reason is considered to be a "dangerous person" under s. 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Mental Health Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's finding that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has jurisdiction to hear a motion of appeal in the matter of personal injury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
