California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Olguin, B264325 (Cal. App. 2016):
Defendant next contends that the prior DUI convictions had "little if any probative value" regarding his knowledge of the consequences associated with refusing a breathalyzer test because "[a]ny person of average intelligence knows that a bad blood-alcohol test could lead to incriminating evidence." He relies on People v. Hendrix (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 216 (Hendrix), but that case is distinguishable.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.