Is a defendant's failure to object to the first three questions sufficient to preserve Doyle error for appellate review?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Vainqueur, B286772 (Cal. App. 2018):

We agree that defendant forfeited any error attached to the first three questions by his failure to object. (People v. Seumanu (2015) 61 Cal.4th 1293, 1333 [objection required to preserve Doyle error for appellate review].)

Other Questions


Is a defendant's failure to object to a motion of defence counsel's objection sufficient to avoid the forfeiture rule? (California, United States of America)
After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)
What is the consequence of defendant's failure to make a timely and specific objection on an objection to a motion of motion? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant's failure to object to a claim of misconduct bar review on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does failure to object at trial preclude appellate review of reasonable doubt instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's objection to giving instructions on voluntary manslaughter preclude a finding of error in the trial court's failure to do so? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's impeachment claim preserved for review at the appellate court because he did not testify at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.