Is a defendant's expressed intention to escape or engage in nonconforming conduct during trial a factor in determining whether there is a manifest need for shackles?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Castaneda, 2d Crim. No. B249571 (Cal. App. 2016):
or his expressed intention to escape or engage in nonconforming conduct during the trial that should be considered in determining whether there is a "manifest need" for shackles.' [Citations.]" (People v. Allen (1986) 42 Cal.3d 1222, 1263.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's intent or mental state is a factor in determining whether they intended to commit an act of violence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's mental state was not a factor in determining whether they had committed a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's age, education, physical condition, and mental health are factors used in determining whether they should be charged with assault? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant claims the trial court made an impermissible dual use of a fact to support both an enhancement and an aggravating factor in his conviction for assault, what is the test for determining whether the sentence should be increased or reduced? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining punitive damages? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury should consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining the penalty? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence and therefore must proceed further to determine the conduct underlying the conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury double-count the factors used to determine whether a defendant has been convicted of a capital crime as a result of the factor? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant who intentionally commits an intentional unlawful killing without malice is guilty of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
