Is a defendant's contention that a trial court's failure to instruct a plaintiff is reviewed under the Chapman standard?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Avina, F067589 (Cal. App. 2015):
3. We reject defendant's contention that the trial court's failure to instruct should be reviewed under the Chapman standard. (Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by the trial court to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by the trial court to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse standard of review apply to any decision by the trial court to instruct or not to instruct? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a challenge to a trial court's failure to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
