Is a defendant's constitutional rights violated de novo?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hollingsworth, A155121 (Cal. App. 2019):
We review the legal question of whether defendant's constitutional rights were violated de novo. (See People v. Cromer (2001) 24 Cal.4th 889, 894.)
C. The Record Does Not Contain Evidence Defendant Objected to Defense Counsel's Concession
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a defendant's state constitutional right to an impartial jury was violated by an excusal for cause? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to make a claim that the use of a styrofoam head violates a plaintiff's constitutional right to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
